Abstract
The meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of hyperbaric oxygen treatment on diabetic foot ulcers. Using dichotomous or contentious random or fixed effect models, the outcomes of this meta-analysis were examined and the odds ratio (OR) and the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. 17 examinations from 1992 to 2022 were enrolled for the present meta-analysis, including 7219 people with diabetic foot ulcers. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment had a significantly higher healed ulcer (OR, 14.39; 95% CI, 4.02-51.52, p < 0.001), higher adverse event (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.11-4.11, p = 0.02), lower mortality (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07-0.71, p = 0.01) and higher ulcer area reduction (MD, 23.39; 95% CI, 11.79-34.99, p < 0.001) compared to standard treatment in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. However, hyperbaric oxygen treatment and standard treatment had no significant difference in amputation (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.22-1.75, p = 0.37), major amputation (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.18-1.92, p = 0.38), minor amputation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.15-2.66, p = 0.54) and healing time (MD, -0.001; 95% CI, -0.76 to 0.75, p = 0.99) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. The examined data revealed that hyperbaric oxygen treatment had a significantly higher healed ulcer, adverse event, and ulcer area reduction and lower mortality, however, there was no significant difference in amputation and healing time compared to standard treatment in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Yet, attention should be paid to its values since most of the selected examinations had a low sample size and some of the comparisons had a low number of selected studies.