Abstract
Alternating pressure support surface (APSS) is a common support surface for treating pressure injury in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, conflicting results on the effectiveness of APSS have been reported and may be associated with inappropriate configurations of APSS. The objectives of this study were to compare the different pressure amplitudes (75/5 mmHg [alternating between 75 and 5 mmHg] vs. 65/15 mmHg) and cycle periods (5 min [4 cycles] vs. 2.5 min [8 cycles]) of alternating pressure on sacral skin blood flow responses in 10 individuals with SCI. Sacral skin blood flow during and after loading of four alternating pressure protocols was assessed using laser Doppler flowmetry and was normalised to the value before loading (10-min baseline, 20-min loading and 10-min recovery). The results demonstrated that during the high-pressure phase, there was a significant difference between the 75/5 and 65/15 mmHg protocols (0.3658 ± 0.0688 for 75/5 mmHg and 0.1702 ± 0.0389 for 65/15 mmHg, p < 0.05); and during the low-pressure phase, there was a significant difference between the 75/5 and 65/15 mmHg protocols (1.7184 ± 0.262 for 75/5 mmHg and 0.5916 ± 0.1378 for 65/15 mmHg, p < 0.05). There were no differences between cycle periods in skin blood flow responses. No adverse events were reported. Our finding indicates that the pressure amplitude of alternating pressure is a significant factor affecting sacral skin blood flow responses. An appropriate configuration of alternating pressure is needed to effectively increase skin blood flow and tissue viability in individuals with SCI.