Pre-clinical studies of plasmin: superior benefit-to-risk ratio of plasmin compared to tissue plasminogen activator

纤溶酶的临床前研究:与组织型纤溶酶原激活剂相比,纤溶酶具有更优的获益风险比

阅读:1

Abstract

Currently-used thrombolytic agents are plasminogen activators (PA). While effective for treating thrombotic disease, PA use is associated with unavoidable hemorrhagic complications in susceptible individuals. Thus, there is an urgent need for new agents or approaches that provide greater hemostatic safety without sacrificing thrombolytic efficacy. Evidence now strongly indicates that 'direct-acting' thrombolytics, which do not require conversion of the precursor plasminogen to the active form plasmin, offer such a potential. The biochemical properties of plasmin provide a theoretical foundation for safe and effective therapy, based on thrombolytic efficacy upon local catheter delivery of agent and neutralization of circulating agent by its inhibitor (alpha-2 antiplasmin) to prevent bleeding complications. In vitro and animal studies support these predictions. In comparison with tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA), plasmin shows a distinct benefit-to-risk advantage. First, plasmin is equally effective as t-PA in thrombolysis and may be superior for treating thrombi in totally-occluded vessels. Second, whereas t-PA causes bleeding from vascular trauma sites in animals when infused at dosages used for thrombolysis (0.5-1 mg/kg), plasmin exhibits safety at therapeutic dosages. In fact, plasmin can be used at several fold higher concentrations than is needed for thrombolysis, thereby providing a significant safety margin that is not attainable for t-PA or other PAs. Phase I trials with plasmin in hemodialysis graft occlusion and peripheral arterial occlusion have thus far confirmed the hemostatic safety of plasmin.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。