Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether nerve conduction could be used to objectively evaluate mean effective volume of 1.5% lidocaine after subparaneural or extraparaneural injection. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing unilateral foot or ankle surgery were randomized into either subparaneural or extraparaneural injection group, and ultrasound-guided continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block was performed. The action potential amplitude of the distal gastrocnemius muscle was monitored. The time of anesthesia onset and dosage of lidocaine were recorded when amplitude declined to 0.5 mV. The operative analgesic effect, score of numeric rating scales, patient's satisfaction, and movement or sensation were recorded during or after surgery. RESULTS: Preoperative dose of local anesthetics (10.7±1.6 vs. 16.2±1.2 mL) and the time of onset (19.4±3.3 vs. 30.4±2.5 min) reduced significantly in the subparaneural group (P<0.05). The intra-operative analgesic effect (1.2±0.422 vs. 1.3±0.483) and the score of resting numeric rating scales (0.6±1.0 vs. 1.9±2.1 and 0.4±0.7 vs. 1.2±1.1) 24 and 48 h after surgery were comparable between groups, but the subparaneural group had markedly lower scores of activity numeric rating scales (0.3±0.6 vs. 2.1±2.0, 0.7±1.2 vs. 2.2±1.9 and 0.5±0.8 vs. 1.5±1.2) at 6, 24 and 48 h, and significantly higher satisfaction (9.7±0.5 vs. 8.8±0.8) (P<0.05). There were no obvious symptoms of movement or sensation within 3 days in two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The nerve conduction can be used to objectively evaluate the mean effective volume of 1.5% lidocaine in different injection groups, and subparaneural injection has more advantages as compared to extraparaneural injection for continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block.