Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total joint arthroplasty. A skin antiseptic solution is used to reduce the bacterial count and prevent PJI. There is no consensus in the literature on the application of antiseptic solutions. This study aims to compare the rate of infection between patients who received alcohol wash with Chloraprep to those who received povidone iodine wash with Chloraprep. Methods: A total of 607 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a single institution between January 2009 and July 2023 were reviewed. Perioperative variables were collected. The infection rate was used as a primary outcome. An odds ratio was calculated to compare infection and complication rates between the groups. Results: For patients who underwent THA, no difference in the rate of complications (alcohol wash: n = 6, 4.5%; povidone wash: n = 5, 3.6%; OR: 0.796; 95% CI: 0.237-2.673) or infection (alcohol wash: n = 1, 0.7%; povidone wash: n = 2, 1.4%; OR: 1.942; 95% CI: 0.174-21.667) was found. No difference in the rate of complications (alcohol wash: n = 3, 1.9%; povidone wash: n = 2, 1.2%; OR: 0.635; 95% CI: 0.105-3.849) or infection (alcohol wash: n = 0; povidone wash: n = 1, 0.6%; OR: 0.994; 95% CI: 0.983-1.006) was found in patients who underwent TKA. Conclusions: Surgical site preparation using alcohol wash with chlorhexidine offers similar short-term benefits in preventing postoperative infection to a povidone iodine wash with chlorhexidine in primary total joint arthroplasty. The use of alcohol wash and chlorhexidine is effective, while reducing the preparation time.