Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We always confirm the diagnosis of syndesmotic injury with a Hook test for all ankle fractures and fixed if necessary. Then, we noticed a discrepancy between preoperative radiology and the Hook test. Moreover, we want to report the reliability of syndesmotic fixation decisions with Hook test and preoperative radiology. METHODS: A total of 37 surgically treated patients with isolated Weber type C ankle fractures were included in the study. In all patients, the syndesmosis joint was injured in preoperative computed tomography and X-ray imaging. However, only patients with (+) Hook tests had undergone a syndesmosis fixation. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A: Hook tests (+) and Group B: Hook test (-). Also, the groups were compared according to clinical outcomes with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), and foot and ankle disability index (FADI) scores. RESULTS: The mean participant age was 39 (19-80) years, and the mean follow-up period was 47.27 (22-68) months. Groups A and B consisted of 17 (45.9%) and 20 (54.1%) patients, respectively. The mean VAS, AOFAS, and FADI scores were 17.7±14.3, 90.32±8.06, and 92.9±6.88, respectively. "Excellent" and "good" results were found in 34 (%91.8) patients according to AOFAS nad FADI. The malreduction rate was 8.1% in all patients, 5% in group A, and 11.8% in group B. No statistically significant differences in final functional scores were found between groups A and B. CONCLUSION: Hook test is reliable and adequate for evaluating the stability and quality of syndesmosis reduction. Weber type C lateral malleolar fractures in the decision of syndesmosis fixation; although syndesmosis injury is diagnosed in preoperative radiology, we recommend that the diagnosis be confirmed with the Hook test.