Does syndesmotic fixation technique impact complication rates and functional outcomes measured by PROMIS scores following operative repair of ankle fractures?

踝关节骨折手术修复后,采用下胫腓联合固定技术是否会影响并发症发生率和通过 PROMIS 评分衡量的功能结果?

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether syndesmotic fixation technique impacts outcomes following ankle fracture surgery. This study investigates which repair technique, transyndesmotic screws, Suture Button (SB), and suture tape augmentation (STA), results in fewest complications and best functional outcomes measured by Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests (CATs) of physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI). METHODS: 782 patients who underwent ankle fracture surgery at a single institution between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Two fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons independently reviewed all radiographs, determined fixation technique, and assessed complications. Open fractures, pilons, and neuropathies were excluded. 252 had syndesmotic injury identified via intraoperative fluoroscopy. 159/252 who had minimum one-year radiographic follow-up were included for complications analysis. These 159 were sent post-operative PROMIS CATs. 68/159 consented and were included for final analysis of PROMIS. Kruskal-Wallis test compared PROMIS across repair types. Multinomial logistic regression adjusted for propensity scores included as covariates modeled PROMIS by technique. RESULTS: 62/159 had screw, 59/159 SB, and 38/159 STA. Screw complication rate was 12.9% (8/62): 8.1% (5/62) degenerative joint disease (DJD), 6.5% (4/62) syndesmotic malreduction. SB complication rate was 1.7% (1/59): 1.7% (1/59) DJD. STA had no radiographic complications. Mean PF was 50.5 ± 7.9 screw, 53.9 ± 9.7 SB, and 52.2 ± 13.1 STA (p = 0.72). Mean PI was 49.6 ± 8.2 screw, 47.9 ± 8.8 SB, and 49.2 ± 10.5 STA (p = 0.75). Mean PF was 5.1-points (95%CI: -0.9-11.1) higher for SB and 5.2-points (95%CI: -1.3-11.7) greater for STA vs. screw. Mean PI was 3.2-points less for SB (-3.2, 95%CI:-8.5-2.1) and 4.4-points less for STA (-4.4, 95%CI: -10.1-1.3) vs. screws. CONCLUSIONS: Syndesmotic fixation with either SB or STA reduces complications compared to screw. While this study was underpowered to detect differences in PROMIS, improved PROMIS for SB and STA vs. screws suggest that these techniques may result in better functional outcomes compared to screws.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。