Clusters of multidimensional exercise response patterns and estimated heart failure risk in the Framingham Heart Study

弗雷明汉心脏研究中多维运动反应模式的聚类与估计的心力衰竭风险

阅读:1

Abstract

AIMS: New tools are needed to identify heart failure (HF) risk earlier in its course. We evaluated the association of multidimensional cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) phenotypes with subclinical risk markers and predicted long-term HF risk in a large community-based cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 2532 Framingham Heart Study participants [age 53 ± 9 years, 52% women, body mass index (BMI) 28.0 ± 5.3 kg/m(2), peak oxygen uptake (VO(2)) 21.1 ± 5.9 kg/m(2) in women, 26.4 ± 6.7 kg/m(2) in men] who underwent maximum effort CPET and were not taking atrioventricular nodal blocking agents. Higher peak VO(2) was associated with a lower estimated HF risk score (Spearman correlation r: -0.60 in men and -0.55 in women, P < 0.0001), with an observed overlap of estimated risk across peak VO(2) categories. Hierarchical clustering of 26 separate CPET phenotypes (values residualized on age, sex, and BMI to provide uniformity across these variables) identified three clusters with distinct exercise physiologies: Cluster 1-impaired oxygen kinetics; Cluster 2-impaired vascular; and Cluster 3-favourable exercise response. These clusters were similar in age, sex distribution, and BMI but displayed distinct associations with relevant subclinical phenotypes [Cluster 1-higher subcutaneous and visceral fat and lower pulmonary function; Cluster 2-higher carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CFPWV); and Cluster 3-lower CFPWV, C-reactive protein, fat volumes, and higher lung function; all false discovery rate < 5%]. Cluster membership provided incremental variance explained (adjusted R(2) increment of 0.10 in women and men, P < 0.0001 for both) when compared with peak VO(2) alone in association with predicted HF risk. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated CPET response patterns identify physiologically relevant profiles with distinct associations to subclinical phenotypes that are largely independent of standard risk factor-based assessment, which may suggest alternate pathways for prevention.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。