Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods

SGLT2抑制剂在已确诊心力衰竭患者中的间接比较:基于贝叶斯方法的证据

阅读:1

Abstract

AIMS: Head-to-head comparisons among SGLT2 inhibitors treatments in established heart failure remain absent. We conducted a systematic review of dedicated heart failure trials to assess indirectly the composite outcomes and individual clinical endpoints among SGLT2 inhibitor treatments. METHODS AND RESULTS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo in patients with established heart failure. A Bayesian approach to network meta-analysis was applied. Five trials including four treatment strategies were included in this study. The composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.66-1.55), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.91-2.65), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.90-2.69). All-cause mortality showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.711-1.18), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.68-1.59), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.74-1.73). Cardiovascular death showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.71-1.23), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.61-1.55), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.66). Hospitalization for heart failure showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64-1.97), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.74-3.15), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.68-2.78). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with established heart failure, there was no significant difference of the major efficacy outcomes among SGLT2 inhibitor treatments; however, sotagliflozin may be associated with the lowest risk of the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, and dapagliflozin may be associated with the lowest risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。