Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare nonpregnant blood pressure and circulating metabolic factors between formerly pre-eclamptic women who did and did not deteriorate to eclampsia. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. POPULATION: Formerly pre-eclamptic women with (n = 88) and without (n = 698) superimposed eclampsia. METHODS: Women who experienced pre-eclampsia with or without superimposed eclampsia during their pregnancy or puerperium were tested for possible underlying cardiovascular risk factors at least 6 months postpartum. We measured blood pressure and determined cardiovascular and metabolic risk markers in a fasting blood sample. Groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's Rho test or Fisher's Exact test (odds ratios). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in postpartum blood pressures and features of the metabolic syndrome between formerly pre-eclamptic and formerly eclamptic women. RESULTS: Formerly pre-eclamptic women who developed eclampsia differed from their counterparts without eclampsia by a lower blood pressure (P < 0.01) with blood pressure correlating inversely with the likelihood of having experienced eclampsia (P < 0.001). In addition, formerly eclamptic women had higher circulating C-reactive protein levels than formerly pre-eclamptic women (P < 0.05). All other circulating metabolic factors were comparable. Finally, 40% of all eclamptic cases occurred in the puerperium. CONCLUSIONS: Formerly pre-eclamptic women with superimposed eclampsia have lower nonpregnant blood pressure compared with their counterparts without neurological sequelae with blood pressure negatively correlated to the occurrence of eclampsia. As about 40% of all eclamptic cases occur postpartum, routine blood pressure monitoring postpartum should be intensified.