A large-scale, multicentered trial evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of digital PCR versus ARMS-PCR for detecting ctDNA-based EGFR p.T790M in non-small-cell lung cancer patients

一项大规模、多中心试验,评估数字 PCR 与 ARMS-PCR 在非小细胞肺癌患者中检测 ctDNA EGFR p.T790M 的灵敏度和特异性

阅读:19
作者:Jiachen Xu #, Wei Wu #, Chunyan Wu, Yong Mao, Xiaowei Qi, Lin Guo, Renquan Lu, Shuhong Xie, Jiatao Lou, Yu Zhang, Yiyan Ding, Zijian Guo, Li Zhang, Naixin Liang, Peng Chen, Cuicui Zhang, Min Tao, Zhengyuan Yu, Hua Geng, Meilin Xu, Meiqi Shi, Li Wang, Wei Guo, Jun Zhao, Jianjie Li, Lixia Shi, Yan Zha

Background

Developing liquid biopsy technology with higher sensitivity and specificity especially for low-frequency mutations remains crucial. This study demonstrated superior performance of the newly developed digital PCR (dPCR) kit for ctDNA-based EGFR p.T790M detection in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) against ARMS-PCR.

Conclusions

dPCR is a sensitive and accurate tool for ctDNA-based EGFR p.T790M detection due to its significantly improved sensitivity without compromising specificity, and dPCR is equivalent to ARMS-PCR as a companion diagnostic tool while benefiting more patients under Osimertinib treatment.

Methods

This large-scale, multi-centered diagnostic study recruited 1,045 patients including 1,029 patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC and 16 patients with specific samples between April 1st 2018 and November 30th 2019. EGFR p.T790M in plasma samples from mNSCLC patients were tested using dPCR with ADx-ARMS PCR and Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test V2 as comparator assays to confirm cut-off value for dPCR and evaluate its performance against ARMS-PCR-based assays. Efficacy was evaluated for patients with EGFR p.T790M detected by dPCR or ARMS-PCR, who underwent Osimertinib treatment.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of dPCR against ADx-ARMS PCR was 98.15%, 88.66% and 90.16%, respectively for 1,026 plasma samples. Additional 9.26% patients were detected positive by dPCR. The majority of those samples had a mutation allele frequency between 0.1% and 1%. In 45 paired tissue and plasma samples, the sensitivity improved from 30.77% to 53.85% by dPCR with the specificity over 90%. The response of Osimertinib in 74 EGFR p.T790M-positive patients detected by dPCR, including 26 determined as negative by ARMS-PCR, were evaluated to have an ORR of 44.59% and a DCR of 90.54%. Conclusions: dPCR is a sensitive and accurate tool for ctDNA-based EGFR p.T790M detection due to its significantly improved sensitivity without compromising specificity, and dPCR is equivalent to ARMS-PCR as a companion diagnostic tool while benefiting more patients under Osimertinib treatment.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2100043147.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。