cEEG and rEEG detection rates of prognostic indicators in cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

cEEG 和rEEG 检测心脏骤停患者预后指标的检出率:系统评价和诊断荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accurate neuroprognostication following cardiac arrest is essential for clinical decision-making; however, the comparative diagnostic performance of continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) and routine electroencephalography (rEEG) remains uncertain. Although cEEG is preferred for the detection of dynamic electrographic abnormalities such as nonconvulsive status epilepticus, the implementation of this technique is limited by high resource demands. Whether rEEG, a typically brief (20-30 min) recording, provides comparable prognostic accuracy is still debated. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 2010 to December 2024 for studies relating to comatose post-cardiac arrest patients. Methodological quality was assessed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2) and QUADAS-C. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata v18.0, with pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) was estimated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (5,895 patients) were included. cEEG exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 0.53 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.61] and specificity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.00; AUC = 0.85). rEEG yielded a sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.42-0.58) and a specificity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92-0.99; AUC = 0.75). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness while Deeks' test indicated low publication bias (cEEG: p = 0.48; rEEG: p = 0.05). DISCUSSION: Despite the theoretical advantages of cEEG in monitoring evolving brain activity, rEEG demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance, particularly in specificity, with substantially lower resource requirements. Our findings suggest that rEEG may serve as a feasible alternative or complementary tool to cEEG, especially in resource-constrained or time-sensitive settings, thereby supporting more accessible EEG-based neuroprognostication. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251151755, CRD420251151755.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。