Abstract
BACKGROUND: In various neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), sets of differential methylation marks (referred to as DNA methylation signatures or episignatures) are syndrome-specific and useful in evaluating the pathogenicity of detected genetic variants. These signatures have generally been tested using methylation arrays, requiring additional experimental and evaluation costs. As an alternative, long-read sequencing can simultaneously and accurately evaluate genetic and epigenetic changes. In addition, genome-wide DNA methylation profiling with more complete sets of CpG using long-read sequencing (than methylation arrays) may provide alternative but more comprehensive DNA methylation signatures, which have yet to be adequately investigated. METHODS: Nine and seven cases of molecularly diagnosed Sotos syndrome and ATR-X syndrome, respectively, were sequenced using nanopore long-read sequencing, together with 22 controls. Genome-wide differential DNA methylation analysis was performed. Among these differential DNA methylation sites, a single-locus DNA methylation mark at part of the NSD1 CpG island (CpGi) was subsequently studied in an additional 22 cases with a NSD1 point mutation or a 5q35 submicroscopic deletion involving NSD1. To investigate the potential utility of a single-locus DNA methylation test at NSD1 CpGi for differential diagnosis, nine cases with NSD1-negative clinically overlapping overgrowth intellectual disability syndromes (OGIDs) were also tested. RESULTS: Long-read sequencing enabled the successful extraction of two sets of differential methylation marks unique to each of Sotos syndrome and ATR-X syndrome, referred to as long-read-based DNA methylation signatures (LR-DNAm signatures), as alternatives to reported DNA methylation signatures (obtained by methylation array). Additionally, we found that a part, but not all, of the NSD1 CpGi were hypomethylated compared with the level in controls in both cases harboring NSD1 point mutations and those with a 5q35 submicroscopic deletion. This difference in methylation is specific to Sotos syndrome and lacking in other OGIDs. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous evaluation of genetic and epigenetic alterations using long-read sequencing may improve the discovery of DNA methylation signatures, which may in turn increase the diagnostic yields. As an example of the outcomes of these analyses, we propose that a single-locus DNA methylation test at NSD1 CpGi may streamline the molecular diagnosis of Sotos syndrome, regardless of the type of NSD1 aberration.