Abstract
Processes formalized in classic Reinforcement Learning (RL) theory, such as model-based (MB) control, habit formation, and exploration have proven fertile in cognitive and computational neuroscience, as well as computational psychiatry. Dysregulations in MB control and exploration and their neurocomputational underpinnings play a key role across several psychiatric disorders. Yet, computational accounts mostly study these processes in isolation. The current study extended standard hybrid models of a widely-used sequential RL-task (two-step task; TST) employed to measure MB control. We implemented and compared different computational model extensions for this task to quantify potential exploration and perseveration mechanisms. In two independent data sets spanning two different variants of the task, an extended hybrid RL model with a higher-order perseveration and heuristic-based exploration mechanism provided the best fit. While a simpler model with complex perseveration only, was equally well equipped to describe the data, we found a robust positive effect of directed exploration on choice probabilities in stage one of the task. Posterior predictive checks further showed that the extended model reproduced choice patterns present in both data sets. Results are discussed with respect to implications for computational psychiatry and the search for neurocognitive endophenotypes.