Rurality and Use of Metastasis-Directed Therapies for Medicare Beneficiaries with Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

农村地区与转移性结肠癌医疗保险受益人转移灶靶向治疗的使用情况:一项回顾性队列研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver- and lung-directed local therapies can eradicate metastatic disease and prolong survival for selected patients with oligometastatic colon cancer. Evidence about the association of rurality with access to metastasis-directed therapies and survival outcomes is limited. METHODS: A retrospective study analyzed fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with colon cancer metastatic to liver and/or lung using claims from 2016-2019. The exposure of interest was residential rurality, categorized as metropolitan versus non-metropolitan (i.e., rural). The study evaluated the association of rurality with use of metastasis-directed therapies (surgery, stereotactic radiation, and ablation) via multivariable logistic regression. Survival analyses used proportional hazards regression and treated receipt of metastasis-directed therapy as a time-varying covariate. RESULTS: The study identified 11,796 beneficiaries with colon cancer metastatic to liver and/or lung, 26.6% of whom lived in rural areas. Overall, 7.3% of the beneficiaries received any metastasis-directed therapy. Rural residence was not significantly associated with metastasis-directed therapy (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.31). However, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility and greater area deprivation were significantly associated with lower odds of metastasis-directed therapy. Metastasis-directed therapy was associated with a decreased hazard of death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.41 for beneficiaries receiving metastasis-directed therapy within 90 days after cancer diagnosis; 95% CI, 0.35-0.49). Rural residence was not independently associated with mortality (adjusted HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Metastasis-directed therapy was associated with decreased mortality from metastatic colon cancer. Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility and greater area deprivation both were associated with lower use of metastasis-directed therapy, but residential rurality was not. New care delivery approaches are needed to extend equitable access to metastasis-directed therapies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。