Abstract
The invariant choice of L-amino acids and D-ribose RNA for biological translation requires explanation. Here we study this chiral choice using mixed, equimolar D-ribose RNAs having 15, 18, 21, 27, 35, and 45 contiguous randomized nucleotides. These are used for simultaneous affinity selection of the smallest bound and eluted RNAs using equal amounts of L- and D-His immobilized on an achiral glass support, with racemic histidine elution. The experiment as a whole therefore determines whether RNA containing D-ribose binds L-histidine or D-histidine more easily (that is, by using a site that is more abundant/requires fewer nucleotides). The most prevalent/smallest RNA sites are reproducibly and repeatedly selected and there is a four- to sixfold greater abundance of L-histidine sites. RNA's chiral D-ribose therefore yields a more frequent fit to L-histidine. Accordingly, a D-ribose RNA site for L-His is smaller by the equivalent of just over one conserved nucleotide. The most prevalent L-His site also performs better than the most frequent D-His site-but rarer D-ribose RNAs can bind D-His with excellent affinity and discrimination. The prevalent L-His site is one we have selected before under very different conditions. Thus, selection is again reproducible, as is the recurrence of cognate coding triplets in these most probable L-His sites. If our selected RNA population were equilibrated with racemic His, we calculate that L-His would participate in seven of eight His:RNA complexes, or more. Thus, if D-ribose RNA were first chosen biologically, translational L-His usage could have followed.