Comparison of the effects of drug-coated balloon and bare metal stent in the treatment of lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans

药物涂层球囊支架与裸金属支架治疗下肢闭塞性动脉硬化症疗效的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) and bare metal stents (BMS) in treating lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans (LEASO). METHODS: Clinical data of 83 patients who underwent LEASO angioplasty with DCB or BMS at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College from July 2021 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the DCB (n=43) and BMS (n=40) groups based on the treatment method. Changes in ankle-brachial index (ABI), pulse volume recording (PVR), vascular endothelial function indicators, incidence of complications, and patency rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Three months after the surgery, the ABI and nitric oxide (NO) levels in the DCB group were higher, while the upstroke time (UT), percentage of mean arterial pressure (%MAP), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), and endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels were lower than those in the BMS group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). One year after the surgery, the patency rate of the DCB group was higher than that of the BMS group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DCB treatment for LEASO is superior to BMS in improving vascular function, protecting endothelial function, and achieving a one-year patency rate.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。