Association of mNUTRIC and NRS 2002 Scores with Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients

mNUTRIC评分和NRS 2002评分与重症监护病房患者死亡率的相关性

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: In intensive care unit (ICU) patients, comorbidities, age, and nutritional status may affect mortality and different scores assess nutritional status. The Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (NUTRIC) score incorporates IL-6, age, APACHE II, SOFA score, the number of comorbidities, and time to ICU admission. A high score (6-10) indicates a high malnutrition risk. The modified NUTRIC Score (mNUTRIC score) does not include IL-6 and scores of 5-9 indicate a high malnutrition risk. In the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) score, malnutrition is graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe, and a score of ≥3 indicates malnutrition risk. Our objective was to examine the association of mortality with the mNUTRIC and NRS 2002 scores on the first day of admission to the ICU. METHODS: Our observational, prospective study was conducted with 50 ICU patients between November 2018 to January 2019 mNUTRIC and NRS 2002 scores were recorded at admission and their associations with mortality were analyzed. The duration of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay were compared between high and low risk patients. RESULTS: The NRS 2002 and mNUTRIC scores did not differ in their association with mortality. The high-risk group according to the NRS 2002 had significantly longer(p=0.048) mechanical ventilation duration than the low-risk group. CONCLUSION: The mNUTRIC score was used instead of the NUTRIC score due to infeasibility of IL-6 monitoring. The NRS 2002 and mNUTRIC scores did not differ in their association with mortality. Both scores may be recommended for routine use in the ICU.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。