A comparative analysis of postoperative visual outcomes following cataract surgery with different brands of Monofocal Intraocular Lenses

不同品牌单焦点人工晶状体白内障手术后视觉效果的比较分析

阅读:2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare visual outcomes after cataract surgery using three intraocular lenses (IOL) of different prices but similar properties. METHODS: A comparative study with retrospective data of patients operated for phacoemulsification with monofocal IOL implants was carried out at Al-Ibrahim Eye Hospital (AIEH) from April 2021 to Feb 2022. Patients with diabetes, any preoperative ocular morbidity and unclear diagnosis were excluded from the study. Pre and post-operative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on 1(st) day, 7(th) day and 4-6 weeks were analyzed. IOLs were categorized on the basis of price into economical, standard and premium lenses. To minimize surgical bias, data was further stratified on the basis of surgical expertise. RESULTS: Data of 3237 patients was analyzed. Economical lens (A) was implanted in 2647, standard (B) in 254 and premium (C) in 336 patients. On average BCVA (6/6 to 6/12) was achieved in 88.2% of patients. No significant difference was found at third follow up among BCVA of three IOls operated by senior surgeon, χ(2)((2)) = 3.216, p = 0.20, with median (IQR) is 0.2(0.2) logMAR for Group-A, 0.1(0.2) logMAR for Group-B and 0.2(0.1) logMAR for Group-C. When results of the rest of the surgeons was considered, significant difference was found among BCVA at 3(rd) follow-up, χ(2)((2)) = 6.661, p = 0.036, with median (IQR) is 0.3(0.2) logMAR for Group-A, 0.2(0.1) logMAR for Group-B and 0.2(0.3) logMAR for Group-C. CONCLUSION: When surgical factors mainly, surgeon bias is removed, all three types of monofocal IOL had similar visual outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。