Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of haemorrhoidectomy done by using LigaSure with conventional Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was done at Department of Surgery Dow University Hospital Karachi during January 2013 to September 2015. A total of 55 patients were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to group A (Haemorrhoidectomy by Ligasure) and group B (Milligan Morgan Haemorrhoiectomy). Efficacies of both procedures were compared by operative time, Blood loss, wound healing, and pain score on immediate, 1st and 7(th) post operative day. RESULTS: Out of total 55 patients 23 were male and 32 were females. The most common group of age involved was between 40 - 60 years. Third degree Heamorrhoids were present in 37 (67.3%) of patients while remaining 18 (32.7%) had fourth degree Heamorrhoids. Group A included 29 cases while Group B included 26 cases. The mean operating time of Group A was 52.5 with standard deviation of 11.9 while it was 36.6± 9.8 in the other group. The mean blood loss in group A was 51.92 with standard deviation of 15.68 while it was 70.34±25.59 in group B. Overall pain score was less in those patients who underwent Heamorrhoidectomy by Ligasure method. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of Heamorrhoidectomy by Ligasure is better than the traditional Milligan Morgan Heamorrhoidectomy but we need more clinical trials with large sample size and long term follow ups.