Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) of 30 minutes for emergency Caesarean sections (CS) has been widely recommended, but there is little evidence to support it. Recent studies however, have questioned not only the practicability of this target but also its anticipated beneficial effect on neonatal outcome and medico-legal implications. Our objective in this study was to find out the time between decision-delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean section at a tertiary care institution in Nigeria Methods: This was a retrospective study of cases of emergency Caesarean section performed over a 12-month period. Relevant data were collected from the labour ward and theatre records and case files of the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria between January 1 and December 31, 2012. RESULTS: A total of 352 emergency Caesarean sections done during the period were reviewed. Only 20 (5.7%) of these were performed within the recommended 30 minutes DDI. The mean DDI was 106.3 + 79.5 minutes and there was no significant correlation between DDI and perinatal outcome. The major causes of delay were anaesthetic delay and busy theatre suits. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a lack of correlation between DDI and perinatal outcome, which may indicate decision delivery interval of 30 minutes or less may not be applicable to all emergency CS, especially in developing countries with infrastructural challenges. However when faced with acute or catastrophic foetal or maternal conditions, expedited delivery is indicated.