A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Lytic and Non-lytic Early Thrombus Removal Technologies for Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

溶栓和非溶栓早期血栓清除技术治疗髂股深静脉血栓的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness and safety of lytic and non-lytic early thrombus removal strategies in addition to anticoagulation versus anticoagulation alone. BACKGROUND: Early thrombus removal strategies have been developed to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) following acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: This review followed PRISMA guidelines using a registered protocol (CRD42023437158). The MEDLINE and Embase databases, as well as trial registries, were searched without limitations. Head-to-head or single-armed trials or studies that reported the rate of PTS in patients with iliofemoral DVT (symptomatic for <28 days) and early thrombus removal were included. The rates of PTS, moderate-severe PTS, major bleeding, risk-benefit ratio, DVT recurrence, and mortality were pooled in meta-analysis with fixed or random effects. RESULTS: Across all study designs (20 studies), the rate of PTS was 24.5% (95% CI: 19.5-30.3%) for lytic therapies, 18.8% (1 study) for non-lytic therapy, and 40.4% (95% CI: 35.3-45.7) for anticoagulation alone. The number needed to treat was 6 for PTS and 15 for moderate-severe PTS. In randomized trials, the odds of major bleeding with lytic therapies were 4.9 (95% CI: 1.3-19.1) compared with anticoagulation; the number needed to harm was 33. There was no major bleeding for mechanical thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Early thrombus removal reduces PTS and moderate-severe PTS, while increasing nonfatal major bleeding. Mechanical thrombectomy removes major bleeding risk, but efficacy evidence is limited to 1 observational study.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。