Abstract
BACKGROUND: A lack of geographic and racial diversity in clinical trial populations may arise from a disproportionate focus on the United States and Europe for trial leadership and conduct. Inadequate diversity may compromise the external validity to the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, where 60% of global cardiometabolic disease exists. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the proportion and trends of Asian race participants and APAC authorship in cardiometabolic trials. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all cardiovascular, diabetes and obesity-related randomized controlled trials (phase ≥2, n = ≥100) published in these major medical journals: the New England Journal of Medicine, the Lancet, and the Journal of the American Medical Association between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. Trial leadership was defined by first authorship, and any listed author was considered a trial collaborator. Temporal trends were evaluated using the Jonckheere-Terpstra proportion test and correlations using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Participant-to-prevalence ratios (PPR) were determined using Global Health Data Exchange registry data. RESULTS: A total of 8.3% (218,613 of 2,619,710) participants identified as being of Asian race and 7.7% of total enrollment occurred in APAC. APAC lead authorship occurred in 52 of 656 (7.9%) trials and collaboration in 10.1% (1312 of 13,000 of authors), which correlated with Asian enrollment (r = 0.63 and r = 0.76, respectively). A marginal increase in the proportion of Asian race (Δ1.40% ± 6.95%/year, P = 0.003) and APAC regional (Δ1.46% ± 8.67%/year, P = 0.003) enrollment was observed; however, severe regional underrepresentation persisted (PPR <0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a favorable trend over the past decade, Asian participants and authors from APAC remain significantly underrepresented in seminal cardiometabolic trials; barriers to trial conduct and leadership in this region must be addressed.