Efficacy and safety of primary suture following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the treatment of elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated by choledocholithiasis

腹腔镜胆总管探查术后行原位缝合治疗老年胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的疗效和安全性

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of primary suture following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in the treatment of elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated by choledocholithiasis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 164 elderly patients, aged older than 70 years, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration at our center from January 2015 to December 2024. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the surgical strategy used, namely, primary suture following LC + LCBDE (PS group) and T-tube drainage following LC + LCBDE (T-tube group). General data, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and postoperative complications in the two groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age (77.1 ± 4.6 vs. 78.3 ± 5.2 years, p = 0.126), gender (p = 0.523), body mass index (24.7 ± 2.1 vs. 24.3 ± 1.8, p = 0.192), diameter of common bile duct (14.1 ± 3.8 vs. 13.4 ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.158), American Society of Anesthesiologists risk grading (p = 0.545), and hematological indicators and comorbidities (p > 0.05) between the two groups. All the patients successfully underwent laparoscopic surgery without any case being converted to laparotomy. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the PS and T-tube groups (54.6 ± 26.4 vs. 58.8 ± 24.7 mL, p = 0.297). However, surgical duration (113.7 ± 23.8 vs. 129.2 ± 39.5 min, p = 0.004) was significantly shorter in the PS group. In addition, the PS group had a significantly shorter exhaustion time (2.1 ± 0.7 vs. 2.9 ± 0.6 days, p = 0.000) and postoperative hospital stay (6.1 ± 1.9 vs. 8.2 ± 1.6 days, p = 0.000) and lower hospitalization expenses (21.2 ± 5.9 vs. 26.6 ± 7.4 thousand, p = 0.000). In terms of postoperative complications, there were significant differences in the incidences of electrolyte disturbance (11.3% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.042) and bile leakage (0.0% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.030) between the PS and T-tube groups. No serious complications, such as intra-abdominal infection, bleeding, or death, occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: Primary suture following LCBDE is a safe and effective treatment approach for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis in elderly patients. When the surgical criteria are strictly executed, primary suture offers superior perioperative outcomes over T-tube drainage, facilitating patients' recovery without increasing postoperative complications.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。