Efficacy comparison of subcutaneous mastectomy using gasless and gas-insufflation single-port transaxillary approaches for gynecomastia

比较无气和有气单孔经腋入路行皮下乳房切除术治疗男性乳房发育症的疗效

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of gasless and single-port gas-insufflation transaxillary approaches in subcutaneous mastectomy for treating patients with gynecomastia (GM). METHODS: This study enrolled 46 patients with GM from May 2022 to October 2023. Twenty patients underwent subcutaneous mastectomy using the single-port gas-insufflation transaxillary approach (gas-insufflation group), while the other 26 patients received the same procedure through the gasless transaxillary approach (gasless group). This study further conducted inter-group comparisons in terms of the operation time, intraoperative bleeding, volume of postoperative drainage, timing of drainage tube removal, short-term postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and medical costs. RESULTS: All the 46 patients completed the operation successfully without conversion to open surgery, with confirmed diagnosis of GM through pathology. The average surgical time for the gasless group was significantly shorter than that of the gas-insufflation group (38.20 ± 10.773 vs. 62.96 ± 15.311 min, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between groups in incision length, intraoperative bleeding, unilateral postoperative drainage volume, drainage tube retention time, length of postoperative hospital stay, or postoperative cosmetic outcomes (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study supports the clinical feasibility of using gasless transaxillary approach for subcutaneous mastectomy of patients with GM.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。