Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic and prognostic test qualities of the enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to compare them with the latex fixation test. METHODS: Rheumatoid factor tests were performed in 1988 consecutive new rheumatology outpatients within two months after their first visit to the outpatient clinic of the Department of Rheumatology of Leiden University hospital. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and predictive values of the tests in discriminating RA from non-rheumatoid arthritis and erosive from non-erosive disease after two years of follow up were determined and presented as receiver operating characteristic curves and post-test probability curves. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the ELISA for IgG, IgA, and IgM rheumatoid factor for RA versus all controls at optimal cut off titres was 72%, 44%, and 69%, respectively; the specificity was 52%, 84%, and 86%. For the latex fixation test the sensitivity was 66% and the specificity 91%. The post-test probability of RA, at a clinical prevalence rate of 12%, given a positive test result in the ELISAs for IgG, IgA, and IgM rheumatoid factor and the latex fixation test, was 17%, 27%, 40%, and 49%, respectively; with negative test results the probability was 7%, 8%, 5%, and 5%, respectively. The specificity of all tests in discriminating erosive from non-erosive RA at two years was low: 41%, 44%, 47%, and 58% for the ELISAs for IgG, IgA, and IgM rheumatoid factor and the latex fixation test, respectively. CONCLUSION: The ELISAs for IgG and IgA rheumatoid factor are of no significance in diagnosing RA and in the prediction of erosive disease. The ELISA for IgM rheumatoid factor is a reasonable alternative for the latex fixation test when age and gender are taken in to consideration. The specificity of all rheumatoid factor tests in discriminating erosive from non-erosive RA is low.