Association between Size of Hip Capsule Defect on Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram and Overall Joint Distraction in Revision Hip Arthroscopy: An In Vivo Study

磁共振关节造影显示的髋关节囊缺损大小与翻修髋关节镜手术中关节整体分离程度的相关性:一项体内研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hip instability and postoperative laxity negatively affect patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy. With the hip capsule playing a substantial role in stability, unrepaired capsulotomies and decreased capsular thickness have both been demonstrated to contribute to increased hip distractibility on axial traction studies. While capsular violation increases distractibility, the role of capsular defect size is less understood. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: It was hypothesized that there would be a statistically significant association between hip capsule defect size on magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) and hip distraction. This study evaluates the relationship between capsular defect size on MRA and hip distractibility in revision hip arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A retrospective review of a single-surgeon database of revision hip arthroscopy patients with capsular defect on preoperative MRA and available traction data was queried. Patients <18 years or a history of a previous ipsilateral hip surgery were excluded. Capsular defect was also measured on preoperative MRA (mm(2)), utilizing coronal and axial sequences. Axial traction was applied on a post-free traction table at intervals of 0 to 100 pounds of force, with distraction distance defined as the hip joint space. RESULTS: Of 94 charts reviewed, 67 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 33.2 ± 9.6 years, 83.6% were women, the mean body mass index was 27 ± 6.2 kg/m(2), and 39 (78%) patients had Beighton scores of <4. The mean distraction distance at 100 pounds of axial force was 8.3 ± 3.6 mm, the mean capsule defect size was 87.1 ± 77.5 mm(2), with a mean length of 7.8 ± 4.6 mm, and a mean width of 10.3 ± 4.7 mm. Linear regression demonstrated no statistically significant relationship between overall distraction distance and the size (β = -0.002; R = 0.396; P = .773), length (β = -0.046; R = 0.398; P = .681), and width of the hip capsule defect (β = -0.040; R = 0.397; P = .695). CONCLUSION: No significant correlation was found between capsule defect size on MRA and hip distraction distance. Given that hip distractibility increases with capsular violation, we suspect that capsular disruption itself is a critical determinant of stability as opposed to the size of the defect.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。