Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a commonly employed surgical approach for recurrent patellar dislocation. However, the impact of elevated body mass index (BMI) on postoperative complication rates remains controversial. PURPOSE: To compare the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of patients with normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)) and those with elevated BMI (≥25 kg/m(2)) who underwent MPFL reconstruction for recurrent acquired lateral traumatic patellar dislocation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort Study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 70 patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation were included in this study. Patients with recurrent patellar dislocation were categorized into 2 groups based on their BMI: the normal BMI group and the elevated BMI group. Functional scores (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner, and Kujala scores) and radiological measurements (patellar tilt angle, patellofemoral trochlear congruence, lateral patellofemoral angle, and lateral patellar displacement) were evaluated both preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The occurrence of postoperative complications at the last follow-up was also recorded. Differences in functional scores and radiological parameters before and after surgery were analyzed with paired-samples t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Comparisons between groups were conducted using independent-samples t tests or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. RESULTS: In the normal BMI group, there were 13 male patients and 27 female patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 26.15 ± 13.16 months. The mean age in this group was 21.93 ± 7.94 years. The elevated BMI group consisted of 12 male patients and 18 female patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 27.50 ± 15.79 months and a mean age of 23.30 ± 8.43 years. At the final follow-up, the incidence of surgical failure (patellar redislocation or subluxation and necessitating secondary surgery) was significantly higher in the elevated BMI group (6 out of 30 patients; 20.0%) compared with the normal BMI group (1 out of 40 patients; 2.5%) (P < .05). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in postoperative Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner, and Kujala scores compared with the preoperative period (P < .05). Notably, the normal BMI group had significantly higher preoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores compared with the elevated BMI group (P < .05). Furthermore, the elevated BMI group exhibited less improvement in Tegner and Kujala scores compared with the normal BMI group (P < .05). Postoperative radiological parameters in both groups returned to the normal range (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of radiological parameters and their corresponding differences. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated statistically significant increases in postoperative clinical scores for both groups, although the intergroup differences varied. Specifically, patients with elevated BMI demonstrated poorer preoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores. The postoperative improvement in radiological parameters was equally good between the 2 groups.