Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the clinical outcomes of using 1 versus 2 suture anchors for anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair. PURPOSE: To compare the function and activity-related outcomes of arthroscopic ATFL repair using 1 versus 2 suture anchors. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 46 patients (22 patients in the 1-anchor group, 24 patients in the 2-anchor group) who underwent ATFL repair between January 2015 and December 2017. American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score, Karlsson and Peterson score, and Tegner activity level were evaluated preoperatively and ≥2.5 years postoperatively. At follow-up, patients were also asked about time to return to sport as well as level and intensity of physical fitness. Satisfaction was evaluated with the Sefton grading system. RESULTS: After ≥2.5 years of follow-up (30 months in the 1-anchor group, 33 months in the 2-anchor group), patients in the 2-anchor group had a higher Tegner activity level than those in the 1-anchor group (mean ± SD, 4.75 ± 1.07 vs 4.05 ± 1.17; P = .039). As compared with patients in the 2-anchor group, fewer patients in the 1-anchor group returned to their preoperative activity level (54.2% vs 22.9%; P = .029); the rate of activity at the same or higher intensity as preinjury was also lower in the 1-anchor group (50% vs 79.2%; P = .038). However, there were no differences between the groups in terms of American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society and Karlsson and Peterson scores, time to return to work/sport, duration of activity participation, level of physical fitness, or satisfaction according to Sefton grading. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic ATFL repair appears to be an effective treatment regardless of whether 1 or 2 suture anchors are used. The techniques had similar functional outcome scores, but 1-anchor repair produced inferior activity-related outcomes.