Abstract
BACKGROUND: At present, there is no widely accepted classification system for partial-thickness rotator cuff tears, and as a result, optimal treatment remains controversial. PURPOSE: To examine the interobserver reliability and accuracy of classifying partial rotator cuff tears using the Snyder classification system. We hypothesized that the Snyder classification would be reproducible with high reliability and accuracy. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Twenty-seven orthopaedic surgeons reviewed 10 video-recorded shoulder arthroscopies. Each surgeon was provided with a description of the Snyder classification system for partial-thickness rotator cuff tears and was then instructed to use this system to describe each tear. Interrater kappa statistics and percentage agreement between observers were calculated to measure the level of agreement. Surgeon experience as well as fellowship training was evaluated to determine possible correlations. RESULTS: A kappa coefficient of 0.512 indicated moderate reliability between surgeons using the Snyder classification to describe partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. The mean correct score was 80%, which indicated "very good" agreement. There was no correlation between the number of shoulder arthroscopies performed per year and fellowship training and the number of correct scores. CONCLUSION: The Snyder classification system is reproducible and can be used in future research studies in analyzing the treatment options of partial rotator cuff tears.