Effects of fixative and embedding medium on morphology and immunostaining of the cochlea

固定剂和包埋剂对耳蜗形态和免疫染色的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

The localization of proteins by immunostaining is a powerful method to investigate otologic disorders. However, the use of fixatives and embedding media (necessary for the preservation of morphology) can obscure antigens, making it difficult to perform immunoassays. We performed a systematic investigation of the effects of fixative and embedding medium on morphology and immunostaining of the mouse cochlea. Three different fixative solutions [4% formaldehyde (F), 4% formaldehyde + 1% acetic acid (FA), and 4% formaldehyde + 1% acetic acid + 0.1% glutaraldehyde (FGA)] and 3 different embedding media (paraffin, polyester wax, and celloidin) were used. Morphology was assessed using light microscopy. Immunostaining was studied using a panel of 6 antibodies (to prostaglandin D synthase, aquaporin 1, connective tissue growth factor, 200-kDa neurofilament, tubulin and Na(+),K(+)-ATPase). Preservation of morphology was suboptimal with paraffin, adequate with polyester wax and superb with celloidin. Immunostaining was successful using all 6 antibodies in all 3 fixatives and all 3 embedding media. While there were differences in strength of signal and localization of antigen between the 3 fixatives, overall, FA and FGA gave the most uniform results. For a given fixative and antibody, there was surprisingly little difference in the quality of immunostaining between celloidin and paraffin, while results in polyester wax were not as good in some cases. These results suggest that celloidin may be the embedding medium of choice for both morphological and pathological studies, including immunostaining when morphology must be optimized.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。