Abstract
Following the publication of the above article, the authors contacted the Editorial Office to explain that they had made inadvertent errors in compiling the scratch‑wound assay images in Fig. 1B on p. 2838 and Fig. 4A on p. 2840; essentially, the same data had been included for the '2HF, 10 µM, 0 h' and '2HF, 5 µM, 12 h' experiments in Fig. 1B, and for the 'Vector, 2HF, 5 µM, 12 h' and '2HF, 5 µM, 24 h' experiments in Fig. 4A. However, the authors were able to re‑examine their original data, and realized how these errors had occurred. The revised and corrected versions of Figs. 1 and 4, now including replacement data for the experiments with the PC‑3 cell line (lower panel) in Fig. 1B and the Vector experiments with the DU145 cell line in Fig. 4A, are shown on the next two pages. Note that the errors made with the assembly of the data in these figures did not affect the overall conclusions reported in the paper. The authors apologize to the Editor of Oncology Reports and to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 40: 2836‑2843, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/or.2018.6678].