Public Perception of Medical Errors and Confusion About Medical Complications: Implications for Healthcare Safety in Saudi Arabia

公众对医疗差错的认知以及对医疗并发症的困惑:对沙特阿拉伯医疗保健安全的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assessed public perceptions of medical errors in the Tabuk region, Saudi Arabia, and explored how misconceptions about medical complications influence their views on medical errors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study surveyed 432 participants via an online questionnaire. The collected data included demographics, participants' knowledge, experiences, and perceptions of medical errors, and the accuracy in distinguishing errors from complications. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 37.5% of participants reported having knowledge of medical errors, and 31.5% had directly or indirectly experienced them. 62.4% believed that medical errors are common or very common, and 84% viewed medical errors as a real problem in the healthcare sector. Misdiagnosis (55.6%) was perceived as the most common type of error. While participants demonstrated 71.1% overall accuracy in differentiating medical errors from complications, 62% erroneously classified severe complications (internal bleeding due to blood thinner treatment) as errors. After controlling for confounders, regression analysis demonstrated that greater accuracy in differentiation error from complications was negatively associated with negative views on medical errors (β = -0.373, p < 0.001), though misconceptions alone explained only 16.4% of the variance in these views. Physicians were deemed most responsible for errors, while inadequate preventive measures, low competency, negligence, and lack of medical staff monitoring were identified as key contributors by the participants. CONCLUSION: Negative views on medical errors stemmed in part from misconceptions about medical complications. Targeted educational initiatives clarifying the nature of medical errors and the error-complication distinctions are needed. These measures are essential to fostering trust, improving the accuracy of errors reporting and advancing collaborative safety efforts. The findings from this research advocate for public engagement in healthcare safety initiatives, bridging the divide between patient expectations and healthcare realities.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。