Does Resistance Indicate Malposition? A Standardized Comparison of Pedicle Screw Placement

阻力是否表明位置不良?椎弓根螺钉置入标准化比较

阅读:4

Abstract

Pedicle screw malpositioning remains a frequent complication, with reported rates from 2% to 15%, often leading to revision surgeries. Analyzing mechanical resistance and torque encountered during screw insertion has been implicated as a promising approach for real-time detection. Five fresh-frozen human thoracolumbar spine specimens were utilized in this study. Using 3D-printed templates, correct trajectories were systematically compared against four defined malpositions (medial, lateral, superior, superolateral), with offsets ranging from 2.0 mm to 3.5 mm. Drilling, tapping, and insertion phases were conducted at a constant speed and defined feed force. Contrary to the anticipated behavior, malpositioned trajectories showed no statistically significant difference in peak torque compared to correct trajectories across all phases (e.g., tapping p=0.944, r=0.01; insertion p=0.693, r=0.05). Regional stratification between thoracic and lumbar spine also failed to yield significant differences. The only statistically significant difference was observed between the correct trajectory and the superolateral malposition during drilling (p=0.038). Under the tested standardized conditions, torque-based mechanical resistance during pedicle screw placement is generally not a reliable and consistent real-time indicator of malposition.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。