Abstract
(1) Background: Flexible flatfoot is characterized by medial arch collapse, leading to musculoskeletal impairments. We examined the effects of single-arch foot orthosis (SFO) and dual-arch foot orthosis (DFO) on arch height, kinematics, and kinetics in young females during walking and jogging. (2) Methods: Healthy females (n = 19) with flexible flatfoot were tested under three conditions: regular shoes, SFO, and DFO. Motion capture and a 3D force plate gathered biomechanical data. We also used a high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) to assess dynamic foot morphology. Outcomes included normalized truncated navicular height, medial arch angle, angles and moments at the metatarsophalangeal, subtalar, ankle, knee, and hip joints. (3) Results: Both types of orthoses improved the normalized navicular height and reduced the medial arch angle, with DFO vs. SFO showing greater effects (p < 0.001). DFO vs. SFO was also more effective in limiting the range of motion (ROM) of the metatarsophalangeal joint and dorsiflexion (p < 0.001). Additionally, DFO reduced the ankle range of motion and the maximum knee flexion during walking. Both orthoses reduced subtalar plantarflexion moments during stance (p < 0.001) and modulated ankle plantarflexion moments throughout different phases of gait. DFO uniquely enhanced metatarsophalangeal plantarflexion moments during jogging (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: Dual vs. single transverse arch foot orthosis is more effective in improving gait biomechanics in females with flexible flatfoot. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these benefits.