Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of death. Recent studies have underlined the importance of non-contrast-enhanced chest CT scans not only for emphysema progression quantification, but for correlation with clinical outcomes as well. As about 40 percent of the 300 million CT scans per year are contrast-enhanced, no proper emphysema quantification is available in a one-stop-shop approach for patients with known or newly diagnosed COPD. Since the introduction of spectral imaging (e.g., dual-energy CT scanners), it has been possible to create virtual non-contrast-enhanced images (VNC) from contrast-enhanced images, making it theoretically possible to offer proper COPD imaging despite contrast enhancing. This study is aimed towards investigating whether these VNC images are comparable to true non-contrast-enhanced images (TNC), thereby reducing the radiation exposure of patients and usage of resources in hospitals. In total, 100 COPD patients with two scans, one with (VNC) and one without contrast media (TNC), within 8 weeks or less obtained by a spectral CT using dual-layer technology, were included in this retrospective study. TNC and VNC were compared according to their voxel-density histograms. While the comparison showed significant differences in the low attenuated volumes (LAVs) of TNC and VNC regarding the emphysema threshold of -950 Houndsfield Units (HU), the 15th and 10th percentiles of the LAVs used as a proxy for pre-emphysema were comparable. Upon further investigation, the threshold-based LAVs (-950 HU) of TNC and VNC were comparable in patients with a water equivalent diameter (DW) below 270 mm. The study concludes that VNC imaging may be a viable option for assessing emphysema progression in COPD patients, particularly those with a normal body mass index (BMI). Further, pre-emphysema was generally comparable between TNC and VNC. This approach could potentially reduce radiation exposure and hospital resources by making additional TNC scans obsolete.