Abstract
The Circle of Willis (CoW) describes the arterial system in the human brain enabling the neurovascular blood supply. Neurovascular diseases like intracranial aneurysms (IAs) can occur within the CoW and carry the risk of rupture, which can lead to subarachnoid hemorrhage. The assessment of hemodynamic information in these pathologies is crucial for their understanding regarding detection, diagnosis and treatment. Multi-dimensional in silico approaches exist to evaluate these hemodynamics based on patient-specific input data. The approaches comprise low-scale (zero-dimensional, one-dimensional) and high-scale (three-dimensional) models as well as multi-scale coupled models. The input data can be derived from medical imaging, numerical models, literature-based assumptions or from measurements within healthy subjects. Thus, the most realistic description of neurovascular hemodynamics is still controversial. Within this systematic review, first, the models of the three scales (0D, 1D, 3D) and second, the multi-scale models, which are coupled versions of the three scales, were discussed. Current best practices in describing neurovascular hemodynamics most realistically and their clinical applicablility were elucidated. The performance of 3D simulation entails high computational expenses, which could be reduced by analyzing solely the region of interest in detail. Medical imaging to establish patient-specific boundary conditions is usually rare, and thus, lower dimensional models provide a realistic mimicking of the surrounding hemodynamics. Multi-scale coupling, however, is computationally expensive as well, especially when taking all dimensions into account. In conclusion, the 0D-1D-3D multi-scale approach provides the most realistic outcome; nevertheless, it is least applicable. A 1D-3D multi-scale model can be considered regarding a beneficial trade-off between realistic results and applicable performance.