Abstract
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be an elusive diagnosis and is particularly challenging to monitor during the course of treatment when traditional acute phase reactants are all normal, leaving no empirical means of monitoring. Our study aims to explore the use of more sensitive acute phase reactants and imaging in the initial evaluation and monitoring of GCA. We report the case of an 84-year-old in whom the traditional acute phase reactants were normal but who had perineuritis on imaging and whose high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were elevated. In cases where the traditional measure of inflammatory activity is normal, it may be necessary to consider additional markers.