Prospective study of (99m)Tc-3PRGD(2) SPECT/CT diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

前瞻性研究 (99m)Tc-3PRGD(2) SPECT/CT 诊断食管鳞状细胞癌转移性淋巴结

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) metastasis is a significant prognostic factor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and there are no satisfactory methods for accurately predicting metastatic LNs. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of (99m)Tc-3PRGD(2) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing metastatic LNs in ESCC. METHODS: A total of 15 enrolled patients with ESCC underwent (99m)Tc-3PRGD(2) SPECT/CT and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) examinations preoperatively. High-definition bone carving reconstruction technology (HD-xSPECT Bone) was applied to quantitatively assess the LN's SUV(max) via SPECT/CT. The two methods were compared for diagnosing metastatic LNs with pathology as the gold standard. RESULTS: Among 15 patients, 23 metastatic lymph node stations (mLNSs) were predicted by SPECT/CT, with a mean SUV(max) of 2.71 ± 1.34, of which 15 were pathologically confirmed; 32 mLNSs were predicted by PET/CT with a mean SUV(max) of 4.41 ± 4.02, of which 17 were pathologically confirmed. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of SPECT/CT for diagnosing metastatic LNs were 62.50%, 91.30%, 85.34%, 65.22%, and 90.32%, respectively, and those of PET/CT were 70.83%, 83.70%, 81.03%, 53.13%, and 91.67%, respectively. There was no significant difference in sensitivity (p = 0.061) or specificity (p = 0.058) between the two methods. The AUC(SPECT/CT) was 0.816 and the SUV(max) threshold was 2.5. CONCLUSION: (99m)Tc-3PRGD(2) SPECT/CT might be an effective method for diagnosing metastatic LNs in ESCC, especially in combination with HD-xSPECT Bone. The diagnostic efficiency of this method was noninferior to that of (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The SUV(max) threshold of 2.5 showed the highest agreement with the pathology findings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。