Abstract
BACKGROUND: Segmentectomy for early-stage lung cancer has benefits for survival and parenchymal preservation. However, segmentectomies are technically challenging, thereby resulting in considerable variability in the quality of resection. In this study, we aimed to review the quality of segmentectomies and analyze their clinical impact. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patients diagnosed with stage I lung cancer after segmentectomies between 2013 and 2021. Segmentectomies were classified as anatomical or nonanatomical; anatomical resection included segmental bronchus and vessel (artery and/or vein) divisions; others were classified as nonanatomical. The primary outcome was recurrence-free and overall survival, and the secondary outcome was postoperative spirometry and lung plication, which is seen as a fibrotic line along the stapling site. RESULTS: Of the 132 segmental resections included in this study, 101 (76.5%) were anatomical segmentectomies. The median consolidation-tumor ratio was 0.40, and 83.3% (110/132) had ground-glass opacities (GGOs). Compared to nonanatomical resections, more N1 and total lymph node stations were retrieved after anatomical segmentectomies. Regarding clinical outcomes, recurrence-free survival was better after anatomical segmentectomy (p = 0.049); however, overall survival was not significantly different (p = 0.064). Furthermore, at 3-6 months postoperatively, thicker lung plication at the stapling site was observed in nonanatomical resections (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis for complex segmentectomies revealed a larger decrease in forced-expiration volume in 1 s after nonanatomical resection. CONCLUSION: Anatomical segmentectomy resulted in better survival and a lower incidence of thick lung plication, even in GGO-dominant tumors. Therefore, further standardization and quality management of segmentectomy procedures will improve the clinical outcomes.