Abstract
BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung-the second most common subtype of lung cancer-has a poorer prognosis than lung adenocarcinoma. However, in contrast to lobectomy, the oncological outcomes after segmentectomy for primary squamous cell carcinomas remain unknown; hence, this study investigated these outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy for clinically node-negative primary lung squamous cell carcinoma with a whole tumor size of ≤ 30 mm on preoperative computed tomography scan during April 2010 to December 2020 were included in this study. The cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) among all included patients and propensity score-matched patients were compared using the Gray method. Multivariate analysis using propensity scores and surgical procedures was performed using the Fine and Gray method. RESULTS: Overall, 230 patients were included in this study; of these, 172 (74.8%) underwent lobectomy and 58 (25.2%) underwent segmentectomy. No significant differences were observed in the CIR between patients who underwent lobectomy and those who underwent segmentectomy (5-year rate 18.1% vs. 14.2%; p = 0.787). Moreover, no significant differences in CIR were observed between the propensity score-matched patients who underwent lobectomy (n = 43) and those who underwent segmentectomy (n = 43) (8.6% vs. 8.0%; p = 0.571). Multivariable analysis was performed for CIR using the propensity score; it revealed that segmentectomy was not a significant predictor of worse CIR (hazard ratio, 0.987; p = 0.980). CONCLUSIONS: Segmentectomy may be feasible for treating clinically early-stage lung squamous cell carcinoma; its oncological outcomes are similar to those of lobectomy.