Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess differences in overall survival (OS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving different treatment modalities of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: A total of 463 NSCLC patients receiving TKI treatment were included. OS was compared according to treatment timing in all patients, the elderly, and patients positive for EGFR mutations. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy two patients received TKIs as first-line treatment, 220 as second-line, and 67 as third-line. The results between the three groups were not statistically significant: the one, two, and three-year OS rates were: 55.3%, 22.3%, and 11.3% (first-line); 59.6%, 27.8%, and 14.9% (second-line); and 53.8%, 41.3%, and 29.5% (third-line), respectively (P = 0.095). Results between the three groups of elderly patients were also not statistically significant (P = 0.469). The one and two-year OS rates in EGFR mutation-positive patients receiving first-line treatment were 48% and 17.5%, respectively. The one, two, and three-year OS rates of patients receiving second-line treatment were: 54.2%, 30.3%, and 20.2%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with EGFR mutations receiving first-line or second-line treatment. Thirteen EGFR mutation-positive patients received third-line TKI treatment for a median duration of 7 months. Their one and two-year OS rates were 69.8% and 58.2%, respectively, which were higher than in the other two groups (P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Three lines of TKI therapy can prolong survival in NSCLC patients. Elderly patients can benefit from TKI therapy. EGFR mutation-positive patients can benefit from second-line or third-line TKI therapy.