Is there a difference in the postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia between erector spinae and serratus anterior plane blocks following modified radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled study

改良根治性乳房切除术后,竖脊肌平面阻滞和前锯肌平面阻滞在术后恢复质量和镇痛效果方面是否存在差异:一项随机对照研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The postoperative recovery quality of patients may be associated with the efficacy of perioperative analgesia management. The effects of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) on the quality of recovery following breast cancer surgery have not been clearly established. The objective of the present study is to assess the quality of recovery and analgesic efficiency of ESPB and SAPB as postoperative analgesia methods in modified radical mastectomy surgeries. METHODS: A total of 68 female patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomly separated into two groups. The main outcome of this randomized, double-blind prospective study was the 40-item global quality of recovery (QoR-40) questionnaire score, collected at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. Other measures of interest included postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS), cumulative opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request, demographic data, hemodynamic variables and postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting and dizziness. RESULTS: In the postoperative period after 24 h, the global QoR-40 scores were found as 185.5 (range:150–199) in the ESPB group and 186 (range:158–198) in the SAPB group (p = 0.304). The median time to first analgesic request was 645 min (range:30–740) in the ESPB group and 640 min (range:30–700) in the SAPB group, without any statistical variation between the groups (p = 0.216). Cumulative opioid consumption did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.785). Likewise, no significant difference was detected between the ESPB and SAPB groups in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, SpO₂ levels or complication rates. CONCLUSION: Preoperative administration of ESPB and SAPB in breast cancer surgery improved the quality of recovery and effectively reduced analgesic requirement. Future studies should investigate how local anesthetic type and volume affect postoperative recovery and analgesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04296188 on 03/03/2020.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。