Effect of PEEP and I:E ratio on cerebral oxygenation in ARDS: an experimental study in anesthetized rabbit

PEEP 和 I:E 比值对 ARDS 脑氧合的影响:一项麻醉兔实验研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although PEEP and inversed I:E ratio have been shown to improve gas exchange in ARDS, both can adversely affect systemic hemodynamics and cerebral perfusion. The goal of this study was to assess how changes in PEEP and I:E ratio affect systemic and cerebral oxygenation and perfusion in normal and injured lung. METHODS: Eight anesthetized Chinchilla-Bastard rabbits were ventilated at baseline with pressure-regulated volume control mode, V(T) = 6 ml/kg, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O, FIO(2) = 0.4; respiratory rate set for ETCO(2) = 5.5%, and I:E = 1:2, 1:1 or 2:1 in random order. Ultrasonic carotid artery flow (CF), arterial (PaO(2)), jugular venous blood gases and near infrared spectroscopic cerebral oxygenation (∆HBO(2)) were recorded for each experimental condition. After induced lung injury, the animals were ventilated with PEEP = 9 followed by 6 cmH(2)O. RESULTS: At baseline, inverse-ratio ventilation (IRV) significantly reduced cerebral oxygenation (∆O(2)HB; - 27 at 1:2; - 15 at 1:1 vs. 0.27 μmol/L at 2:1; p < 0.05), due to a significant reduction in mean arterial pressure and CF without modifying gas exchange. In injured lung, IRV improved gas exchange but decreased cerebral perfusion without affecting brain oxygenation. The higher PEEP level, however, improved PaO(2) (67.5 ± 19.3 vs. 42.2 ± 8.4, p < 0.05), resulting in an improved ∆HBO(2) (- 13.8 ± 14.7 vs. -43.5 ± 21.3, p < 0.05), despite a drop in CF. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that unlike moderate PEEP, IRV is not effective in improving brain oxygenation in ARDS. In normal lung, IRV had a deleterious effect on brain oxygenation, which is relevant in anesthetized patients.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。