Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

抗凝治疗在脓毒症中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

ImportanceThe role of anticoagulant therapy as an adjuvant treatment for sepsis remains controversial. Although observational studies have often suggested benefits, large-scale randomized controlled trials have yielded conflicting results, and the risk-to-benefit profile across different anticoagulant agents remains unclear.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy and its effect on all-cause mortality and major bleeding events in adult patients with sepsis as well as explore differences between study designs and anticoagulant types.Data sources: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases from inception to 7 August 2025.Study selection: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing any systemic anticoagulant therapy with placebo or standard care in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock were included.Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major bleeding events. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and results were reported as relative risk with 95% confidence intervals.Main outcomes and results: In total, 10 studies (8 randomized controlled trials and 2 observational studies) involving 7480 patients were included. In the primary analysis of eight randomized controlled trials, anticoagulant therapy was not associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.18; I(2) = 50.9%). Conversely, anticoagulant therapy was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward an increased risk of major bleeding (relative risk, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.66; I(2) = 13.5%). Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences between randomized controlled trials and observational studies (p = 0.018) and suggested potential differences in efficacy among anticoagulant types (p = 0.10).Conclusions and relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, anticoagulant therapy did not significantly reduce mortality in a broad population of patients with sepsis and may increase the risk of bleeding. The routine use of anticoagulants in unselected septic patients is not supported. Future research should focus on specific agents such as heparin in well-defined, high-risk patient subgroups. The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251123750).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。