Comparison of the clinical effect of intravitreal ranibizumab and intravitreal dexamethasone implants in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion complicated with macular oedema: a meta-analysis

比较玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗和玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入剂治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (RNZ) and intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) complicated with macular oedema (MO). METHODS: Five English-language databases were searched from database establishment to August 2025. In this study, the RevMan 5.3 statistical software package was used. RESULTS: A total of 10 articles involving 1,274 patients were included. A meta-analysis showed that intravitreal RNZ was superior to intravitreal DEX implants in improving visual acuity in patients with RVO complicated by MO. In patients with central RVO (CRVO), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved more significantly in the RNZ-treated group than in the DEX group at 6 months (p < 0.001). For patients with branch RVO (BRVO), the RNZ group showed better BCVA improvement than the DEX group at both 1 and 3 months (p < 0.001). Best-corrected visual acuity had improved more at 1 month in the RNZ group (p < 0.001) than in the DEX group. Ranibizumab was superior to DEX in reducing central retinal thickness (CRT) at 3 months in patients with BRVO and in those with CRVO. Patients with BRVO showed a significant decline in CRT at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 6 months (p = 0.005), and patients with CRVO also had a significant improvement in CRT at 6 months (p = 0.005). However, intraocular pressure was higher in the intravitreal DEX group than in the RNZ group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal RNZ is superior to intravitreal DEX implants in improving BCVA and reducing CRT in patients with RVO complicated with MO; however, RNZ is injected more frequently. These findings are primarily derived from short-to-medium-term evidence, highlighting a need for longer-term comparative data. Furthermore, it should be noted that most included studies did not stratify outcomes by ischaemic status, which is a relevant clinical consideration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-026-04716-w.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。