Comparison of corneal thickness measured using the new Revo FC optical coherence tomographer and the pentacam Scheimpflug-based imaging system

比较使用新型 Revo FC 光学相干断层扫描仪和基于 Pentacam Scheimpflug 成像系统的角膜厚度测量结果

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: Corneal thickness is a key measurement in ophthalmology, playing a significant role in diagnosing and monitoring conditions such as keratoconus, corneal dystrophies, and glaucoma, as well as in the preoperative evaluation for refractive surgery and keratoplasty. This study aimed to compare corneal thickness measurements obtained using a Scheimpflug-based imaging system with a new optical coherence tomographer. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled Polish patients with healthy eyes. Measurements were performed using the two devices, the Oculus Pentacam and Optopol Revo FC, in a random sequence. The agreement between the devices was evaluated using correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis, and a paired t-test. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were examined. The central corneal thickness measured by Pentacam was 545.52 ± 30.16 μm, while 539.36 ± 30.16 μm for Revo FC (difference 5.52 μm; 95% CI: 4.42 to 6.61; p < 0.01). The thinnest corneal location measured by Pentacam was 540.93 ± 30.20 μm, while 531.04 ± 30.24 μm for Revo FC (difference 9.27 μm; 95% CI: 7.29 to 10.76; p< 0.01). However, the strong intraclass correlation coefficients (0.99 for central and 0.98 for minimum corneal thickness) indicate a high level of agreement between the two imaging systems. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that corneal thickness measurements with Pentacam were greater than with Revo FC OCT. Although highly correlated, the results cannot be considered interchangeable as the mean differences exceeded clinically acceptable limits.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。