Studying the added effect of sum-of-segments biometry to modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for short eyes

研究分段生物测量法对现代人工晶状体度数计算公式(适用于短眼)的附加影响

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the added effect of sum-of-segments (SOS) biometry to modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes with short axial length. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series that included 99 eyes from 99 patients. Preoperative AXL measurements were conducted utilizing the ARGOS biometer (Alcon, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). The following formulas were used: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, and PEARL-DGS formulas. Additionally, the Barrett formula has been updated and is now incorporated into the ARGOS biometer, introducing the Barrett true axial length (BTAL) formula. RESULTS: EVO 2.0(sos) and PEARL-DGS(sos) formulas had the highest cases within ± 0.25 D of the intended refraction (45.45% and 42.42%, respectively). The PEARL-DGS(sos) was the only formula to show a myopic mean prediction error (-0.25 ± 0.36 D). The Cooke K6 formula showed the highest hyperopic mean prediction error (0.55 ± 0.35 D), followed by EVO 2.0, Cooke K6(sos), and BUII formulas. BTAL had mean prediction error of 0.15 ± 0.47 which is less hyperopic than BUII (0.43 ± 0.39 D). Subgroup analysis of eyes with AXL 21 mm or shorter (n = 57) was done. Again, the PEARL-DGS(sos) formula showed the only myopic mean prediction error (-0.23 ± 0.37 D). CONCLUSION: PEARL-DGS(sos) was the only formula to show a myopic mean prediction error. Using BTAL and SOS option in Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, and PEARL-DGS formulas decreased the undesirable hyperopic shift in the mean prediction error. This effect was more evident in shorter eyes ≤ 21.0 mm.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。