Abstract
Self-motion through an environment induces various sensory signals, i.e., visual, vestibular, auditory, or tactile. Numerous studies have investigated the role of visual and vestibular stimulation for the perception of self-motion direction (heading). Here, we investigated the rarely considered interaction of visual and tactile stimuli in heading perception. Participants were presented optic flow simulating forward self-motion across a horizontal ground plane (visual), airflow toward the participants' forehead (tactile), or both. In separate blocks of trials, participants indicated perceived heading from unimodal visual or tactile or bimodal sensory signals. In bimodal trials, presented headings were either spatially congruent or incongruent with a maximum offset between visual and tactile heading of 30°. To investigate the reference frame in which visuo-tactile heading is encoded, we varied head and eye orientation during presentation of the stimuli. Visual and tactile stimuli were designed to achieve comparable precision of heading reports between modalities. Nevertheless, in bimodal trials heading perception was dominated by the visual stimulus. A change of head orientation had no significant effect on perceived heading, whereas, surprisingly, a change in eye orientation affected tactile heading perception. Overall, we conclude that tactile flow is more important to heading perception than previously thought.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We investigated heading perception from visual-only (optic flow), tactile-only (tactile flow), or bimodal self-motion stimuli in different conditions varying in head and eye position. Overall, heading perception was body or world centered and non-Bayes optimal and revealed a centripetal bias. Although being visually dominated, tactile flow revealed a significant influence during bimodal heading perception.