Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgery is the main treatment option for destroyed-lung (DL) patients with life-threatening massive hemoptysis. However, short-term and long-term surgical safety and efficacy are unclear, prompting this study. METHODS: Data from 124 DL patients undergoing surgery between November 2001 and January 2022 at Beijing Chest Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Data of the DL group (82 cases) and DL + massive hemoptysis group (42 cases) were compared with regard to clinical characteristics, long-term postoperative residual lung reinfection. RESULTS: As compared with DL group rates, The DL + massive hemoptysis group had greater incidence rates of postoperative complications, invasive postoperative respiratory support, long-term postoperative residual lung reinfection, and postoperative tuberculosis recurrence. Revealed risk factors for postoperative complications (Extent of lung lesion resection), postoperative invasive respiratory therapy (preoperative Hb < 9 g/L, severe intraoperative hemoptysis), and postoperative long-term residual lung reinfection (DL with massive hemoptysis). CONCLUSIONS: DL patients with massive hemoptysis had greater rate of invasive respiratory support therapy and postoperative complications. Extensive lesion removal, preoperative anaemia, severe intraoperative bleeding associated with recent postoperative complications for the patient.